Protests held throughout Balochistan in response to court verdict concerning BYC leaders
Protests and a widespread shutter-down strike were reported in various parts of Balochistan following the recent court verdict. The decision sparked outrage among the local population, prompting demonstrations and protests across multiple cities and towns. The unrest reflected the deep-rooted frustration and anger within the community over what they perceive as an unjust ruling.
Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) had previously called for a region-wide strike, urging traders, transporters, students, and political activists to participate in protests against the verdict. The organization emphasized the need for collective action to express dissent and demand justice for the detained activists. The strike aimed to mobilize the community and showcase their opposition to what they described as political victimization.
Following the call to action, protests erupted in cities including Quetta, Khuzdar, Surab, Mastung, Noshki, Turbat, Kalat, and Gwadar. Market closures, rallies, and demonstrations became common features across these regions. Protesters gathered to raise their voices against the court’s decision and demanded the immediate release of Dr. Mahrang Baloch, Shah Jee Sibghatullah, and other activists who have been detained.
The verdict has also attracted criticism from various rights groups and human rights activists, who have condemned the court’s ruling as unjust. Many argue that the charges against the activists are politically motivated and lack sufficient evidence. The criticism underscores the widespread concern about the fairness of the judicial process in such cases, raising questions about the impartiality of the courts.
In contrast, the Balochistan government has defended the court’s decision, asserting that the case was based on evidence presented during the trial. Officials maintained that those responsible for violence against state personnel must be held accountable, emphasizing the need for justice and law enforcement. The government’s stance reflects its commitment to uphold the court’s ruling, regardless of the protests.
Lawyers representing Dr. Mahrang Baloch and Shah Jee Sibghatullah have announced their intention to challenge the convictions before the Balochistan High Court. They argue that the verdict was wrongful and that their clients’ rights have been violated. The legal challenge signifies ongoing efforts to seek justice through the judicial system and highlights the contentious nature of the case.
